News

News

3 tips for separated parents to make the most out of the Christmas holidays

December 10th, 2019

  1. Communicate and plan ahead

After separation parents often put in place a routine for their children.  In some situations the children’s routine will not initially include arrangements for school holidays and special occasions such as Christmas Day.  If you fall into this category, then it is time to start thinking about the upcoming holidays.

Christmas is for many people a very special time, to be shared and celebrated with family.  Christmas is often a challenging time for separated families.  The first Christmas after separation can be particularly difficult due to changing family traditions.

The key to reducing stress and the impact of separation on your children is early and respectful communication.  Give careful consideration as to what annual arrangements, particularly for Christmas Day will suit your family, and enable your children to celebrate with both parents and extended family members.

One of the most common arrangements for Christmas, is for the children to spend Christmas Eve and Christmas morning with one parent and Christmas evening and Boxing Day with the other parent, and alternate these arrangements each year, this ensures the children get to see both parents on Christmas Day.  However, this might not be suitable for every family, for example, families that have traditionally travelled away from home to spend Christmas with family.

Once you have considered what arrangements you think are in your children’s best interests, discuss with the other parent as early as possible and try to reach an agreement.

If you do agree on what the arrangements will be each year, or each alternative year, then it will reduce the need for you to discuss the topic annually.  Consider whether you should formalise your agreement by either a parenting plan or consent order.

If you are considering taking time off work and travelling or camping with your children over the holidays, these plans should also be discussed with the other parent beforehand, and as early as possible.  You should also make sure the other parent is aware of any festivities that your children may be involved in, for example school concerts and plays.

Planning ahead will enable your children to have the best day possible and will reduce the risk that your children will feel ‘caught in the middle’ this festive season.

If you cannot reach an agreement, you should consider inviting the other parent to a mediation so that you can more carefully discuss and focus on putting in place arrangements for the holidays, with the assistance of a mediator.  Mediation is difficult to arrange on short notice, so the earlier you start discussing the holidays, the better.

  1. Gift giving

Consider coordinating your gift giving with the other parent.  It is not uncommon that during the relationship one parent will take responsibility for Christmas shopping.  Now that you have separated it is likely that you are both out hunting for the perfect present for your children.  Consider discussing with the other parent what you are thinking of buying before hitting the stores, to avoid duplication.

If your child brings along with them a gift that they have received from the other parent, be positive and encouraging.  Remember Christmas is about the children. It is also a good idea to ensure your child returns with the gift the next time they see the other parent.

Remember what the Christmas spirit is all about.  Whilst you may envisage gifting your former spouse a lump of coal this year, consider how assisting your children to pick out a small present for the other parent, may help and support them to adjust and feel more comfortable with the changing family dynamic.

  1. Celebrate Christmas Day

After separation, Christmas Day will not feel the same for anyone in your family.  That doesn’t mean that you cannot enjoy Christmas (you may just need to adjust your expectations and make some changes).

For many separated parents, Christmas Day can feel very lonely.  Especially if you find yourself waking up alone Christmas morning or you are not putting the kids to bed Christmas night.  This can be particularly hard where you are used to certain family traditions.

Surrounding yourself with loved ones and family can reduce some of the feeling of emptiness.  Consider making arrangements to stay with loved ones and continue to celebrate and enjoy your traditions.  You may also consider creating new traditions based around the time the children will be spending with you.

If you would like to discuss your parenting arrangements with one of our Cairns and Mareeba family lawyers, contact us today on 4036 9700.

More

Did you get caught on the road?

December 3rd, 2019

It is a privilege to hold a drivers’ licence, not a right.

In Queensland, there are laws that you must obey when issued with a driver’s licence. These laws have been implemented to ensure your safety and others on the road and include road rules. If you do not comply with these laws and are “caught in the act” by law enforcement, you may be charged with a traffic offence.

There may be serious consequences when charged with a traffic offence, even if it is a minor offence.  Penalties can range from monetary fines, loss of demerit points, disqualification of licence, a probation order or at worst, a jail sentence. If you are convicted, this can also affect your chances of obtaining a job, travelling overseas and your ability to obtain a visa.

The penalty imposed depends on the type of offence you have been charged with, your traffic history, your age, character and intellectual capacity, and other mitigating factors such as whether you have pleaded guilty and cooperated with law enforcement agencies.

Generally, there is a maximum penalty for most traffic offences. However, it is within the discretion of the court which decides what penalty to impose, and if a lesser penalty should apply.

At Miller Harris Lawyers, we can help you with a range of traffic related offences, including:

• drink and drug driving
• speeding offences
• unlicensed driving
• driving without due care and attention
• dangerous operation of a vehicle
• dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm and death
• work licence applications
• special hardship orders
• other traffic related offences

Do yourself a favour and get the right legal advice today. Contact our Mareeba criminal and traffic offence lawyers on 4092 3555.

More

A gift for consumers in time for Christmas

November 5th, 2019

With the holiday season quickly approaching, legislation extending the expiry period on gift cards to a minimum of three years provides a welcome gift for consumers across Australia.

The changes will come into effect on 1 November 2019, and as a result, new obligations will be imposed on businesses that supply gift cards (see below implications for businesses).

The key changes are that:

  1. the expiry date must be a minimum of three years;
  2. the expiry date must be clearly displayed on the gift card; and
  3. a majority of ‘post purchase fees’ are banned including activation and account keeping fees.

The expiry date must be displayed as a full date or as a period of time with the date of supply e.g. ‘this card expires 5 years after supply, supply date 01/11/2019” or “valid for 3 years from 11/19″.

These changes will come in force on 1 November 2019 and if the terms and conditions of a gift card purchased on that date do not comply with the new requirements, the terms and conditions will be voided and the new requirements automatically imposed by law.

Cards and vouchers sold before 1 November 2019 will continue to have the same expiry period and applicable fees as stated at the time of purchase.

The three year expiry period does not apply to a number of gift cards or vouchers that are:

  • able to be reloaded or topped up;
  • for goods or services available for a limited time (e.g. for a temporary pop up art exhibition);
  • supplied as part of a temporary marketing promotion (e.g. a voucher valid for one month supplied as a free bonus with a purchase);
  • donated free of charge for promotional purposes (e.g. a voucher supplied on the opening day of a store to be spent on that day);
  • sold for a particular good or service at a genuine discount (e.g. a $50.00 voucher for a service worth $100.00);
  • part of an employee reward scheme;
  • part of a customer loyalty program; or
  • second-hand gift cards.

Implications for businesses

To ensure that businesses comply with these new gift card laws, the Australian Consumer Law Commission recommends that businesses should:

  • update gift card terms and conditions on the cards themselves, any promotional material and websites;
  • update internal systems, training, manuals and policies;
  • place signage on gift card displays and at the counter; and
  • note the changes on the receipt issued with the purchase of a gift card.

Penalties

There are substantial fines for non-compliance of up to $6,000.00 for individuals and $30,000.00 for businesses and companies.

If you have any doubt about your compliance obligations, or whether these new laws will apply to you, please do not hesitate to contact our experienced team on 07 4036 9700.

Happy holiday shopping!

More

Drug Testing in Family Law Matters

October 15th, 2019

Drug and alcohol use is a rising social issue both in Australia and worldwide.  The National Drug Strategy Household Survey[1], conducted in 2016, produced the following alarming statistics:

  1. 1 million Australians, aged 14 years and older, had used illicit drugs in the 12 months prior to the survey, which equates to roughly 16 per cent of the population at the time;
  2. 1 in 5 Australians who reported meth/amphetamine use, also reported using the drug at least weekly;
  3. 4 out of 10 Australians either smoked daily, drank alcohol in risky quantities or used an illicit drug in the 12 months prior to the survey;
  4. 10 per cent of drinkers drove while under the influence of alcohol in 2016;
  5. 1 in 20 had misused pharmaceuticals in the 12 months prior to the survey; and
  6. 1 in 10 Australians aged 14 years and older had been a victim of an illicit drug-related incident in the previous 12 months.

These statistics will shock many.  As a family lawyer it is not uncommon for parents to raise concerns regarding the other parent’s use of illicit substances, alcohol intake or dependence on pharmaceuticals.

In parenting disputes, the paramount consideration is “what is in the child’s best interests”.  In determining what is in the child’s best interests, there are two primary considerations:

  1. “the benefit to the child of having a meaningful relationship with both of the child’s parents; and
  2. “the need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm, from being subjected to, or exposed to abuse, neglect or family violence.”

Substance use is directly relevant to the court’s responsibility to protect a child from harm.  Substance use will typically have a significant impact on the parenting orders that a court will make.

Where allegations are raised, it is common for the parent who is the subject of the allegation to undergo drug testing.  If the parent wishes to defend the allegation, they may submit to drug testing willingly.  If the parent does agree to undertake drug testing, then the court has the power to require that parent to undergo testing.

When making orders for drug testing, the court must consider, among other things, the type of testing, the frequency and process for requesting a test, the timeframe in which a test is to be undertaken, chain of custody issues, the process for obtaining a sample and the consequences of a negative test result.  As a result, the drafting of drug testing orders has become very technical.

The different types of drug tests

When an allegation of illicit substance use, misuse of prescription medication or pharmaceuticals or alcohol dependency is raised, consideration needs to be given as to what type of testing is appropriate and will most likely capture use.  Different tests will be more suitable depending on the frequency, duration, quantity and timing of usage.

The most common types of testing include the following:

  1. Urine analysis: which can detect prescription and illegal drugs as well as alcohol. This testing, is limited in that it can usually only detect use a few days prior to the test and the accuracy of detection depends on the individual being tested and level of usage;
  2. CDT testing: (for alcohol) which can detect high alcohol usage for a period of up to two weeks. The reliability of detection will vary depending on the individual and the quantity and frequency of use during the detection period;
  3. EtG testing: is a type of hair follicle testing which can test alcohol use for up to three months; and
  4. Hair follicle testing: which can detect a variety of illegal and prescription drug use for up to three to six months depending on the length of the hair sample.

Which test, or combination of tests is appropriate, will depend on the alleged substance used, the timing of the use and the pattern of consumption.

If you require assistance with your family law parenting matter, or have concerns regarding your children or the other parent that you wish to discuss, please do not hesitate to contact one of our Cairns and Mareeba family lawyers today on 07 4036 9700.

[1] https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/behaviours-risk-factors/illicit-use-of-drugs/overview

More

BIG LIFE CHANGES: The effect of marriage, divorce and separation on your will

August 22nd, 2019

There seems to be a misunderstanding about divorce and the appropriate time to update your will or do a new will.   You should always have a current and up to date will in place.  Waiting for your divorce to be finalised is never a good reason to delay your estate planning.

What’s the effect of divorce on a will?

In Queensland when a person makes a will (“the willmaker”) and then later divorces, any provision appointing the willmaker’s former spouse as executor, trustee and/or guardian will be revoked and taken to have been omitted from the will.  Further, any gifts made in favour of the former spouse are automatically revoked upon divorce.  All other provisions in a will not relating to the former spouse, generally will remain valid and effective.

As divorce only revokes the provisions to your former spouse in your will and not your whole will,  you do not need to wait for your divorce to be finalised to prepare a new will (and I do not recommend that you wait). Whist this example may seem reasonable to many of you, it is important to bear in mind that only upon a formal divorce will those provisions to a former spouse be revoked.

What happens if I am separated but not divorced?

For married couples, separation alone will not revoke a will. In Australia married couples must be separated for a minimum period of twelve (12) months before making an application for a divorce.  During the period of separation (which is sometimes many years) if you have an old, outdated will in place gifting everything to your former spouse, he/she may get just that, everything.

What if I don’t have a will?

It is just as bad, if not worse, if you don’t have a will in place and you are recently separated but not divorced.  If you do not have a will in place and are legally married at the time of your passing, then under the rules of intestacy your former spouse will get a large portion, if not all, of your estate.

When should I do a new will or update my existing will?

A lot of clients prefer to hold off preparing a new will or reviewing their existing will until their divorce and/or property settlement has been finalised.  I do not recommend this.  Whist you might feel like you have 101 things to do and your life is chaotic, a new or revised estate plan should be at the top of your “To Do” list.

What other life changing events will affect my will?

The ending of a de facto relationship or civil partnership will also revoke the provisions to a former spouse in a will.  So even if you are not married, you should bear this in mind.

Marriage will automatically revoke a will*, unless the will is made “in contemplation of marriage”.    I often find, especially for younger clients, that they still wish to make provisions for their siblings or parents even if they are getting married.  Usually if their parents have gifted them a sum of money or have provided a guarantee to assist them in buying their first home.  If they prepare a will making these provisions for family members and then later get married, and their will has not been made in contemplation of marriage, then these special gifts to family members will be revoked.

*It is important to note that marriage will not revoke the following provisions in a will pre-dating marriage:

  1. a gift to the person to whom the willmaker is married to at the time of the willmaker’s death;
  2. an appointment as executor, trustee, advisory trustee or guardian of the person to whom the willmaker is married at the time of the willmaker’s death;
  3. a will, to the extent it exercises a power of appointment, if the property in relation to which the appointment is exercised would not pass to an executor under any other will of the willmaker or to an administrator of any estate of the willmaker if the power of appointment were not exercised.

Information contained in this article is of a general nature only and is applicable to the current law in Queensland.  It is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity.  Please note that the law in each state and territory may differ.  We recommend that you contact one of our experienced wills and estates solicitors to obtain advice about your individual circumstances.

More

Lost trust deeds – a forgotten saviour?

August 20th, 2019

Lost, destroyed or missing trust deeds can sometimes lead to tears, misery and heart attacks.  But is the situation as dire as it seems if a document, crucial to organising your financial affairs, disappears?

Maybe it is the advent of trusts as a useful financial planning structure, or the rise of the self‑managed super fund (“SMSF”) (read our previous article on self-managed super funds here), but in recent times, well recent for the law, there have been a number of cases which are resurrecting a seemingly forgotten principle of law, the presumption of regularity.

The presumption of regularity is that deeds and other documents will be presumed to have been validly executed and made, unless there is some contrary evidence.  The cases below illustrate the point, and highlight that the presumption is only applied in very limited circumstances, often where there is a substantial lack of evidence.

Sutherland v Woods[1]

In Sutherland v Woods there was a question as to whether a SMSF had been validly established.  The trust deed could not be located, and because there was no deed, Woods claimed that it was not a valid SMSF.

Sutherland sought to rely upon the presumption of regularity and contended that despite the absence of the deed, the fund was valid.  The subsequent conduct of the parties, including their bank and the ATO, led to the conclusion that the SMSF must have been correctly established, even if the deed was now missing.

Importantly, the parties did all they could to locate a signed copy of the original deed, contacting Westpac, the ATO and titles office to see if any of those entities held a signed copy.  These enquiries were unsuccessful, and the parties were forced to rely upon an unsigned copy of the alleged deed.

The court ultimately agreed with Sutherland, and held that although a true signed copy of the deed was unavailable, that did not prevent the inference that the trust had been validly created.

The missing deed would have been conclusive evidence that the SMSF was established correctly.  In absence of the deed, Sutherland was instead required to prove the validity of the SMSF through other means, such as subsequent dealings.

It was apparent that through the actions of the parties, and third parties, relying upon the existence of the deed, the trust had always been intended as a superannuation fund and had been validly created as such.

The absence of the missing document did not invalidate the fund, and indeed the evidence in the circumstances led to the presumption that the establishing deed must have existed at some point.

Re Thomson[2]

In Re Thomson, the deed establishing the trust was not an issue.  Instead, there were two subsequent amending deeds, one was missing and the other unsigned.

The first deed, which was missing entirely, purported to remove two of the original trustees.  The second deed, which was unsigned, referred to the first deed and amended the trust so that if both of the remaining trustees were to pass away, the trust would vest in the estate of whomever survived the longest.

The dispute arose around the validity of the two amending deeds. If they were not valid, then the two trustees who were allegedly removed would be entitled to the property of the trust.  If both were valid, then the trust would vest in the estate of Thomson.

Such matters around the validity of documents when it comes to the administration of an estate are not uncommon, and is the context in which the presumption is commonly applied.

In determining the validity of the irregular deeds, the court again looked at similar factors as in Sutherland.

In particular, the court relied on the fact that since the removal of the trustees, only the two remaining trustees had been signing off on the trust’s financial reports, indicating that the deed existed, and the parties had been acting as if it were the true state of affairs.

The court found that the two irregular deeds could be presumed to be regular because the evidence indicated that was probably the correct and true situation.  The executor was therefore entitled to include the trust property in the deceased’s estate.

So what is the presumption?

So now that we have reviewed a couple of examples of the presumption, when should you be considering relying upon it?

The presumption will only apply in limited circumstances, it should not be considered a cure-all for any trust problems you have.

The courts have held that before applying the presumption:

  1. a considerable amount of time must have passed since the event happened;
  2. there is no other way to prove the existence or validity of the missing deed;
  3. there is some other extrinsic evidence indicating the deed, or missing instrument was valid and people have since acted as if it were valid; and
  4. the presumption must only be applied to a procedural or formal detail.

Point 3 above is clearly identified in the two cases.  The evidence from the bank, the ATO, and financial reports all indicated the legitimacy of the actions being undertaken, even where the deed was not located.

The presumption should not be thought of as applying in all situations, indeed, its limited application throughout the last 50 years suggests it should only be thought of as a last resort.

In many circumstances, simply claiming the deed is lost, without exhausting all possibilities will not be enough.

Before relying on the presumption, consideration should be given to some of the following alternatives:

  1. preparing a deed of rectification;
  2. relying on the trustee powers in the Trusts Act;
  3. for a SMSF, where practicable, rolling the assets over to another SMSF which does not have any issues with documentation; and
  4. last but certainly not least, no effort should be spared in locating the original deed.

Of course, these options are not always available, some may rely on the original trustees still being available, or simply be inapplicable in the circumstances.

Lost or irregular trust documents often have circumstances unique to each case.  For that reason, when irregularities are detected, efforts should immediately be made to correct them.

In most cases involving the presumption, it is not raised until there is a crisis, for example the breakdown of a marriage or the administration of a deceased estate.  By taking proactive steps, most of these situations, and possibly expensive litigation, can be avoided.

The experienced team at Miller Harris can help you, or your clients in dealing with lost or irregular deeds.  Many situations will require a bespoke solution, and our experience across many areas of the law enable us to come up with the right solution to your problem.

Should you have any questions or enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact Ashley Jan on 07 4036 9700, or ashleyjan@millerharris.com.au.

[1] Sutherland v Woods [2011] NSWSC 13 ( http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2011/13.html ).

[2] Re Thomson [2015] VSC 370. ( http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/vic/VSC/2015/370.html )

More

Debunking 4 common family law myths

July 30th, 2019

There are many misconceptions or “myths” in family law that can lead to separating couples making poor decisions that are not in their best interests.  We debunk some of these common myths below.

Myth 1: I am not married so I don’t need to have a property settlement”
Not true; save for very limited exceptions, all de facto and married couples are required by the Family Law Act to formally end their financial relationship through a property settlement within a specific time period.  If in doubt, it is always best to seek advice on whether a formal property settlement is required.

Myth 2: “Property acquired after separation is not relevant”
This is also incorrect.  Whilst the inclusion of assets acquired post-separation will always depend upon the circumstances surrounding the acquisition of the asset, as a general rule, the asset will usually be included in the property pool.  For example, in a recent court case, the court made a decision to include in the property pool, an inheritance of $715,000.00 received by the husband five years after separation.  This is a classic example of why property should be divided and a property settlement formalised soon after separation— not years later.

Myth 3: “If my ex and I agree on the division of our assets, we do not need a lawyer”
Once an agreement is reached, it is important that it is formalised in one of the two ways recognised as binding and enforceable by the family courts.  The parties can apply to the court for consent orders or they can execute a binding financial agreement in accordance with the family law legislation and regulations.  It is important that legal advice is sought in the drafting of these documents.  If a property settlement is not formalised in one of these ways, the family courts will not recognise that a property settlement has occurred, which may leave parties vulnerable to a later court application seeking a further adjustment of property interests.  There are additional benefits in formalising a property settlement including eligibility for an exemption on transfer duty on any property transferred between spouses.

Myth 4:  “Most property settlements are 50/50”
This is another common misconception.  What percentage of the property pool a spouse is entitled to is calculated by applying complex legal principles and precedents.  It includes consideration of many factors.  We encourage clients to obtain legal advice as to their entitlements before discussing the division of their property with their former spouse.

At Miller Harris Lawyers, we understand that separation is stressful and emotional.  We work with our clients to provide strategic legal advice which empowers people to make informed decisions about the future and to move forward with their lives.  If you are going through a separation, contact our expert family lawyers today on 07 4036 9700 to enquire about our fixed fee initial consultations offered at both our Mareeba and Cairns offices.

More

When do children get to decide which parent they will live with?

July 4th, 2019

One common misconception that parents often have following separation is that their child will get to decide who they live with and how much time they spend with the other parent.

The living arrangements for children after separation is a decision to be made by both parents, not the children.  If parents cannot agree to the living arrangements for their children, they are required to attempt mediation to see if they can agree with the assistance of an independent third party.  If there is still not agreement after mediation, then ultimately either parent may need to commence court proceedings asking the court to decide on the arrangements for the children.

The next obvious question is—If children do not get to decide who they will live with, do they get a say in the decision at all?  The answer to this question will depend on the circumstances of the particular family.

For example, we are commonly now seeing that parents who agree to attend a mediation to discuss and try to reach an agreement on the arrangements for their children are adopting one of the two following practices to ensure their children also have a voice in the decision:

  1. Attend a child inclusive mediation.

Unlike the suggestion of the name, the children do not actually attend at the mediation with their parents.  Whilst mediations are run differently by different mediators, generally the mediator will spend time with the children prior to the mediation.  The mediator is trained to create a comfortable and safe environment for the children to share their views on the issues to be discussed at mediation.  Those views can then be brought into the mediation through the mediator.

  1. Obtain a family report prior to mediation

A family report is written by a family report writer, who is usually a social worker or psychologist.  The purpose of the report is to provide recommendations on what parenting arrangements are in the best interests of the children.  In making recommendations, the report writer gathers information through interviewing both parents and significant others, the children (if they are old enough) or observing the children with their parents (if they are not old enough to be interviewed).

A family report is often ordered by a court in parenting proceedings to assist the court in gathering evidence as to what arrangements are in the best interests of the children.  Increasingly however, parents are choosing to obtain a family report privately to assist them in making decisions for their children outside of the court process.

A family report is another way in which children can have their views heard by both parents and is an asset in a mediation. However, ultimately it is the parents or court who have the final say in the children’s care arrangements.

It should be noted that how much weight is given to the views of children will depend on the individual circumstances of the case, and in particular, the age of the children and their maturity.  Whilst children do not get to decide their own care arrangements, the more mature and older they are, the more weight that will usually be given to their views.

The recent High Court decision of Bondelmonte confirms that even children who are mature and approaching the age of 18 are not able to decide their care arrangements.  In that case, the children who were 15 and 17 at the time, were ordered by the court to live with their mother, despite both children expressing that they wanted to live with their father.

If you are going through a separation and would like to discuss your parenting matter, contact one of our family lawyers today on 4036 9700 to find out about our fixed fee initial consultations offered in both our Mareeba and Cairns offices.

More

Rotary FNQ Field Days Update

May 24th, 2019

The largest field days in Northern Australia returns this year to the Mareeba Rodeo Grounds on 29, 30 and 31 May.

The Rotary FNQ Field Days is a biennial event running since the mid 1980’s and delivering the largest community event on the Tablelands.

A combined event of the Rotary Clubs of Atherton and Mareeba, the event raises funds for charities and local community organisations.

With a focus on Farm Safety, Innovation and Mental Wellness, not to mention the tractor pull, the event is not to be missed.

Be sure to visit the friendly team from Miller Harris Lawyers at the event, or drop into our new Mareeba branch in the meantime.

We look forward to seeing you there!

More

The Great Wheelbarrow Race

May 13th, 2019

The annual Mareeba-Chillagoe Wheelbarrow Race is on this weekend.

Each year, competitors gather to run the 140 km along the Wheelbarrow Way from Mareeba through to Chillagoe, and this weekend will be no different.

Starting on Friday 17 May 2019 in Mareeba, individuals and teams in 12 different categories will set off on their journey with wheelbarrows in tow.

Last year, “The Fit Bucks” set the fastest ever time for the race at a cracking pace of 6 hours, 6 minutes and 12 seconds, which will set a tough challenge for competitors this year.

If you are looking to see the action, the event starts Mareeba with a parade down Byrnes Street, directly past the new Mareeba office of Miller Harris Lawyers.

The parade then proceeds to Vaughan Street, with the main event starting at 9.30 am.

If you are in the area, be sure to get along and support this unique and incredible local event.

Additional information can be found on the official website.

More